Court Suppression Hides Federal Racketeering

---

     Federal Courts in New Jersey, Washington DC, New York, Washington state, Texas, and Louisiana have suppressed evidence of police powers, intelligence agency, and military misconduct using neurowarfare (illegal bioweapon brain hacks) and racketeering against US citizens, soldiers and their children from being entered to official federal court records. Many first generation victims were originally selected by religious discrimination against them while in military service as the military and CIA have and do violate 42 U.S.C. §  2000bb-1 and the Establishment clause of the First Amendment. A federal Fifth Circuit Court en banc rehearing petition of the Northern District of Texas and Fifth Circuit panel suppressions is pending, see the pdf download below.

     That suppressed evidence is presented in Evidence Leaves No Doubt below, to help possible victims identify how you may have been victimized during seven decades (1950s to present) of illegal federal police powers, intelligence agency, and military operations against US citizens and soldiers, which continue the criminal conduct patterns established by Congressional investigations of FBI Cointelpro and CIA/Army MKUltra crimes. There were no DOJ prosecutions of any of these crimes by government departments and agencies. 

     Thus far, these illegal actions by federal and other police powers have been affirmed by judicial subterfuges in 12 federal district courts across four appellate circuits of the 12 total appellate circuits in the US. These subterfuges are used to refuse due process rights to trial by jury, and to suppress essential evidence from official government records which expose this illegal program to public scrutiny. An appeal of these suppressions and of the refusal of our federal district courts to the Fifth Amendment due process right of trial by jury for defendants': 

      (i) original religious discrimination violations of the First Amendment Establishment clause prohibiting government interference in religious beliefs and practices by Army, CIA, DOJ/FBI, and others,

      (ii) other constitutional rights violations - of the First, Third, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments - including by DOD secretly quartering soldiers in civilian homes and direct military interference in civilian affairs - and direct violations by DOJ and others of the Fourth Amendment prohibition on general searches of persons, papers, houses, and effects (personal property) run against American families and businesses, 

     (iii) CIA and Army illegal human experiments on American children and adults, including soldiers, veterans, and their families, violating US law in Title 10 and Title 18 Criminal Code § 175 prohibiting bioweapons, among others,

     (iv) DOJ/FBI and other police powers Title 18 Criminal Code §§ 1961-1968 racketeering crimes and Title 42 Chapter 21 Civil Rights and 21B Religious Freedom violations which have sustained involuntary servitude of children and adults for decades, all as perpetrated by these and other defendants, 

has been denied access for district court fact finding by a Fifth Circuit panel, so an en banc rehearing petition is now pending in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (see the pdf downloads below). 

     Approximately 88% of these Senate confirmed federal judges are former DOJ prosecutors. Federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Any nomination of a federal judge can be blocked from being confirmed by a Senator from that state. This DOJ to federal judge pipeline and Senate blocking of judicial nominations has effectively protected the federal government from being directly accountable to victims of illegal government programs for decades. 

     And, of course, some Senators (which include former DOJ prosecutors) aspire to their party's nomination, and sometimes become President, so they have no interest in exposing these kinds of scandals and abuses of American families and businesses by the federal government during their terms in office.   

     Some documents filed below may have been hacked by vandalism, typically CIA or Army cyber. Legal references, citations, verb tenses, and word modifications from proper grammar to out of context and nonsensical phrasing are among the most common forms of vandalism you may note in these documents.