Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Assaults on national leaders are assaults on national sovereignty, acts of war. World War I was started by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the heir apparent to the Austria-Hungary Emperor in 1914. More than 15 million people died in Europe during World War I, including 116,000 American military personnel. Quoting our Founders on the safety of the American People, or "national security" as that term is used today:
"But the safety of the people of America against dangers from FOREIGN force depends not only on their forbearing to give JUST causes of war to other nations, but also on their placing and continuing themselves in such a situation as not to INVITE hostility or insult; for it need not be observed that there are PRETENDED as well as just causes of war.
"It is too true, however disgraceful it may be to human nature, that nations in general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting anything by it; nay, absolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans."
- John Jay, Federalist Paper #4, November 7, 1787. Founder. Descendant of Protestant Huguenot immigrants who had fled Catholic France in the 1680s after French King Louis XIV revoked the 1598 Edict of Nantes (executive order of prior King Henry IV), and thereby abolished Protestant civil rights, so King Louis XIV could confiscate Protestant Huguenot properties and award them to himself and his followers. Jay signed the 1783 Treaty of Paris which formally ended the 1775-1781 Revolutionary War with the British King. As First Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court 1789-1795, Jay served the American People in the co-equal Supreme Court, at the same time as George Washington served as the first President to manage the co-equal Executive Branch of the US government, which implemented policies and laws adopted by the co-equal Congress. 85 Federalist Papers were published in American newspapers between October 1787 and May 1788. Three Founders - John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison - explained the new Constitution, which created three co-equal branches in our federal government, with a separation of, and specific limitations on, the powers of each of the three branches. State legislatures worked in late 1787-1788 to approve this new Constitution which created our federal government, subject to the adoption of the Bill of Rights completed in 1791. Federalist Paper #4 complete at:
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1404/1404-h/1404-h.htm#link2H_4_0002
Bush 43 And Russia - Despite The 9/11 Retaliatory Attack, American Presidents Press On Unilaterally Absent Constitutional Authority
Congress can declare war using its power found in Article I section 8 clause 11 of our Constitution. Presidents are called upon to defend the nation but may not initiate offensive unilateral acts of war without Congressional approval. But - using both analytical analysis of public information and specific direct personal experience with illegal abuses of executive power by the United States government over the past sixty plus years, it’s obvious that the spirit of presidential cowboy-style adventurism in the national sovereignty of other nations continued in the Bush 43 administration ("Bring It On") - even after the 9/11 retaliatory attack for decades of US meddling in the national sovereignty of other nations precipitated wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This time the target of offensive acts of war without constitutional authority was Russian leadership – the same type of attack that had launched World War I and 15 million deaths in Europe. The weapon of choice– the internationally prohibited bioweapon. President Bush 43 had "looked into Putin’s soul" (paraphrased quote) on their first meeting in 2001. His minions hatched a plan so Bush 43 could add Russian leadership to his list of conquests. No constitutional authority? No matter. It would be done secretly with the illegal bioweapon instead of openly as in World War I. Perhaps it would crush Russian leadership. It was a gamble, but….
Illegal bioweapon assaults on individuals were already well practiced, known to be effective. They had been run before - on Dennis and two successive wives - by Burns, CIA’s illegal bioweapon program manager (intelligence) and the son of an Army General (military). Burns acted with no constitutional authority and in violation of federal law (18 U.S.C. § 175 provides life in prison as the ultimate penalty for these criminal violations) – and ignored by Dennis’ traffickers who worked as FBI agents and US Justice Department prosecutors.
Burns ran these Nazi-style illegal human bioweapon experiments in 1987-1990, destroying Dennis’ first marriage to the ex-wife of a sheriff's deputy, and then organized, orchestrated, and commanded a second one to an Army coerced bisexual enlisted soldier. Then, between 2002 and 2005, federal military and police powers agencies used millions of dollars and hundreds of personnel sworn to secrecy, to indirectly destroy Dennis, reducing him to homelessness and one rolling suitcase by December 2005 – out of sight and out of time. This campaign then illegally human trafficked Dennis from Seattle to Boston– where the fight against the feudal acts of an authoritarian king who stole the religious rights, the personal papers and possessions, and burned the houses, farms, and businesses of American colonists – had triggered the American Revolution in the 1770s. See this programmed destruction narrative at Facts A paragraphs 419-464 and 608-610 https://banbrainhacks.org/hacks%2C-perps%2C-patterns
Bush 43 sent CIA’s Burns, posing as a State Department Ambassador, to Russia to begin the secret illegal bioweapon assault on Russian leadership in November 2005, just one month before Dennis’ trafficking out of sight out of time to Boston was completed, These internationally prohibited (1972 Bioweapon Treaty) US bioweapon neurowarfare brain hacking attacks on Russian leadership - offensive acts of war – began without the Constitutionally mandated Congressional approval required by Article I, Section 8, clause 11.
By May 2008, these secret internationally prohibited US bioweapon neurowarfare assaults on Russian leadership were completed. The most visible casualty of this secret bioweapon brain hacking neurowarfare on Russian leadership was Vladimir Putin’s long marriage to Lyudmila Putina. Oxytocin (the love hormone) and adrenaline (fight or flight/anger/rage hormone) were the likely bioweapon synthetically induced hormones of choice used for this programmed destruction of the Putin relationship, and to encourage another then secret relationship, which led to the Putin’s eventual divorce in 2014.
Bush 43’s Horrific Epilogue – Which He Shares With Burns, Later Biden’s CIA Director
The Russian government did not fall while CIA’s Ambassador Burns was in Moscow from 2005-2008, it did not fall later. Instead, Burns program merely consolidated distrust of the West in Russia, and led to a crackdown on moderates in the country. Bush’s gamble utterly failed. Putin and Russian leadership had still more, and very personal, reasons, to mistrust the West. In 2014, Putin invaded Crimea, to take back that sovereign territory from Ukraine, and rebuild the buffer state arrangement under the former Soviet Union which deprived those people of a measure of freedom. He chose this path rather than going directly to war with the United States for its attacks on Russian leadership.
Bush 43 left behind the landmines of an even more troubled relationship with Russia to his successors. Constitutional authority of presidents is limited to defensive operations (defending the nation during or after an attack). Under Article I Section 8 clause 11, offensive acts of war (initial attacks by our nation) require a declaration only Congress can give. Bush 43 paid no mind to this explicit constitutional limit imposed by our Founders to limit reckless conduct in unilateral offensive acts of war by ANY single elected government official. Unprovoked attacks on the national leadership of any country are acts of war against that country - and the US would regard them exactly that way.
There are other key differences between these parties:
President Putin has full possession and control of a competing superpower and its full suite of thousands of nuclear weapons accessible on command, as well as its full array of instruments of state, including its financial resources, intelligence and military operations, contacts with irregular resources for sabotage and other secret retaliatory operations.
Dennis and his successive wives, citizens of a supposedly free United States dedicated to individual liberty and democracy rather than Nazi style determinism by authoritarian fiat, lack liberty, justice, and the rights for which our Founders fought and died to displace a feudal King, who burned their houses and stole their property. These same acts have been criminally perpetrated by our government on others, known and yet unknown, for periods of time from a few moments to entire lifetimes, with no valid legal basis. None of these citizens have their “unalienable” constitutional rights, which prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude, and protect their “persons, papers, houses, and effects” from arbitrary acts of government. Control of their lives is determined in secret by US government executives such as Burns and Bush 43, acting with impunity and totalitarian authority over on-going illegal human experiments on these American children and adults, through racketeering acts, and systematic violations of our Constitution.
Bush 43 lives quietly in Texas, protected from the consequences, carnage, and risks his reckless unconstitutional acts have wrought by other dedicated government employees, as they strive to maintain our national government’s façade of good order and constitutional discipline.
Biden 45 returned Burns to CIA as its Director from 2021-2025, no longer hiding behind the tattered State Department diplomatic cover he had used for many years. Secret Service, Army, and CIA had used Biden’s double as Dennis’ fake father-in-law from 1988 to 2004, after Burns destroyed Dennis first marriage and organized a programmed second marriage to a persecuted female enlisted Army Intelligence soldier. Whether Biden ever actually appeared as Dennis’ fake father-in-law role in western Washington while serving as a Senator on Foreign Relations and Judiciary, is not yet known.
Burns, a CIA employee and son of an Army Brigadier General who chose the intelligence track instead, operated as a privileged subjugator and perpetrator of Dennis and others in criminally illegal and internationally prohibited acts of government, departed Moscow in May 2008. Burns was promoted to Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs from 2008-2011, then Deputy Secretary of State from 2011-2014. He had global discretionary authority, responsibility, and access, and the illegal bioweapon, usable against any person in further internationally prohibited deployments (1972 Bioweapon Treaty) by the United States. Any other international deployments of the internationally prohibited bioweapon while he was in those roles, and in prior roles related to the Near East (the US government name for the Middle East) from 1996-2005, are not yet publicly known and have not been analyzed here.
War Powers - As Understood By Wise Men Who Actually Knew War
Our 34th President, former World War II commanding general of Allied forces in Europe Dwight Eisenhower, who defeated the fascist Hitler, warned Americans in his 1961 farewell address about the scale and scope of our national defense complex - then already the largest on the planet - and the temptation to use force to solve global problems which can be resolved peacefully, raising these concerns about America even as the Soviet Union presented a mortal threat to liberty and democracy: https://youtu.be/mHDgsh6WPyc
In modern times we spend over 38% of all global expenditures on our military and intelligence operations and are responsible for 42% of all arms sales to other nations. We're 4.2% of the world's population - and our government has engaged in offensive acts of war which exceed constitutional authority of US presidents on a regular basis since World War II.
Our Founders defined constitutional constraints on offensive war powers. As John Jay said in 1787, just a few years after the heavy casualties of our Revolutionary War, while our federal government was being formed to provide for our "common defence":
"But the safety of the people of America against dangers from FOREIGN force depends not only on their forbearing to give JUST causes of war to other nations, but also on their placing and continuing themselves in such a situation as not to INVITE hostility or insult; for it need not be observed that there are PRETENDED as well as just causes of war.
"It is too true, however disgraceful it may be to human nature, that nations in general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting anything by it; nay, absolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans."
Our Constitution, Article I section 8 clauses 11-16, places offensive war powers in the hands of Congress to call into service our military:
“To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;”
Our Constitution, Article II section 2 clause 1 defines the war powers of the President, when called into service by Congressional declaration of war, and otherwise to defend in the event of attack:
“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;”