This page includes forensic identifications made prior to the last federal lawsuit filed in June 2024. Forensic identifications made since that time, including members of Congress, senior military officers, senior CIA, State, and Justice Department officials, foreign intelligence officers, and their specifc roles in these illegal operations to and including indirect homicide attempts, are described at https://banbrainhacks.org/new-corruption-identities
The illegal bioweapon program violates US criminal law 18 U.S.C. §§ 175-178 as well as the Racketeering Act 18 U.S.C. §§ 1861-1868, among other statutes. Each and all the named individuals contributed and/or agreed to the perpetration of these illegal acts in substantial ways. Congress defines a conspiracy in plain language at https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41223 excerpted below:
“The essence of conspiracy is an agreement of two or more persons to engage in some form of prohibited conduct. The crime is complete upon agreement, although some statutes require prosecutors to show that at least one of the conspirators has taken some concrete step or committed some overt act in furtherance of the scheme. There are dozens of federal conspiracy statutes. One, 18 U.S.C. 371, outlaws conspiracy to commit some other federal crime. The others outlaw conspiracy to engage in various specific forms of proscribed conduct. General Section 371 conspiracies are punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years; drug trafficking, terrorist, and racketeering conspiracies all carry the same penalties as their underlying substantive offenses, and thus are punished more severely than are Section 371 conspiracies.
“Since conspiracy is an omnipresent crime, it may be prosecuted wherever an overt act is committed in its furtherance. Because conspiracy is a continuing crime, its statute of limitations does not begin to run until the last overt act committed for its benefit. Since conspiracy is a separate crime, it may be prosecuted following conviction for the underlying substantive offense, without offending constitutional double jeopardy principles; because conspiracy is a continuing offense, it may be punished when it straddles enactment of the prohibiting statute, without offending constitutional ex post facto principles. Accused conspirators are likely to be tried together, and the statements of one may often be admitted in evidence against all.”
BanBrainHacks.Org